William Jennings Bryan

Much like the Republican problems during the 1892 election, in which Gr all over Cleveland won his minute term of office, the Democratic caller faced problems in the 1896 election. Cleveland, who had won on the strength of comminute unions and his insurance on fiscal policy, lost on both of his signature issues. His use of the military during a railroad boot in 1894 and his comment that he would he would commission the military to do government services if the postal service struck did not please himself to the growing labor movement within the Democratic company.These blunders caused the Republicans to gain over 100 House seats and control over the Senate in the 1894 midterm elections. The Populist Party reached a critical juncture in 1896. At the 1896 Democratic nominating convention, the more than progressive aspects of the party rallied behind Nebraskan politician William Jennings Bryan. Bryan, a proponent of silver currency, gave a speech now referred to as the mess up of Gold speech in which he derided the Republican administration of monetary policy in the past and hoped for a more democrat flack to government in the future.The Democrats rallied behind Bryan and the syllabus reflected not only his populist agenda but their future fusion with the Peoples Party to create a more progressive and hobnailed party. The Democratic platform included advocacy for impoverished silver and the possibility of international bimetallism, a federal income tax, statehood for Western territories, and a decreased tariff. When the Peoples Party met at their nominating convention, they voted to fuse their candidates to the Democratic Party and pool resources with the more unionised Democrats.The Republican Party, resurgent with their congressional success in 1894, rallied around Ohio regulator William McKinley, the namesake of the 1890 tariff bill that was hotly contested in this decade. McKinley and the Republicans shaped a platform around the gold standard, an increase in protective tariffs more vigorous navy, increased standards for immigration, the acquisition of Hawaii, and an opposition to the idea of bimetallism. His monetary policy shifted miners and the lower class towards Bryan, but his measured platform managed to keep labor and business happy.The two ladders had contrasting styles. William Jennings Bryan crisscrossed the nation giving get speeches that were both fiery and inspiring to Democratic activists. However, Bryan lost gold Democrats and progressives who were off off by his policy towards the economy and towards his focus on rural populations. The McKinley campaign, managed by Republican operative Mark Hanna, received several billion dollars in donations to aid in the Republican campaign. For the most part, Hanna got these donations out of businesses and the tight that were afraid of a Bryan presidency and agrarian revolt.McKinley ran a front porch campaign while 1400 plus Republican speakers went around the nation stumping against the radical William Jennings Bryan. While Bryan did well in the West and the South, the more densely populate industrial North and Midwest went to McKinley who was able to win the election. If Bryan had won the election, things would consume been vastly different. No one can make a billion dollars honestly. Bryan was widely regarded as a prominent spokesman for millions of rural Americans who were suffering from the stinting depression following the Panic of 1893.William Jennings Bryan seed in free and unlimited specie of silver, which he thought would remedy the economic ills then plaguing farmers and industrial workers. This inflationary measure would have increased the amount of money in circulation and back up cash-poor and debt-burdened farmers. He blamed big business for the economic depression that was present. If elective President of the United States, he would have advanced his idea for free coinage of silver. Although this would have been benefi cial for the majority of farmers, many of the rest of the population would have been extremely unhappy.The big business partners would have gotten together and plan for the assignation for William Jennings Bryan which would have been successful. Bryan should have never messed with big business because, they mean(a) business. Destiny is no matter of chance. It is a matter of choice. It is not a thing to be waited for, it is a thing to be achieved. I believe that it was William Jennings Bryans destiny to lose the election of 1896 so that he would not be assassinated. It was for the better of the country that he had not won the election. The economic strategy of farming for the country was coming to an end regardless.